Andy Arvanitis

Unfortunately I don't use nix myself, and the support we have came from contributors. The last PR related to nix came from @iclanzan, and the most recent change related to...

I'm also running Big Sur and have run into the same problem. Here is a purescript issue on the matter: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/issues/3960 And I just noticed that someone posted a workaround...

Hi @jjthiessen , sorry for the very late response. I haven't been working on or looking at this project for a while now. As discussed previously in this thread, I've...

The thunk for foreign values is implicit – the compiler creates the nullary accessor function for you – so your exports should just be the values you want to set....

The FFI definitely changed when going from the older (pure11) implementation to the current one, so there might be some things left over from when people ported their code.

Yeah, it could be done, especially with a library like that available. However, I haven't planned on doing it. Earlier backends I created required the full FFI implemented (for every...

There's also the idea of checking *implemented* ffi values to make sure they are correct (which maybe you were also getting at earlier). I haven't made plans for that either...