Andrew Lee

@lbianchi-lbl @ksbeattie We should enable `pylint` checking for this ASAP to make sure it doesn't start creeping back in,

Some comments received from a new IDAES user on some of the advanced tutorials: > As a follow up to our discussion here is my feedback on some idaes docs...

A basic version of this has been added, and will be expanded in 2023 scope.

@lbianchi-lbl @adowling2 Did we ever get this working?

@viiibhav @jghouse88 Not sure if either of you still receive these, but input and review on this PR would be welcome.

@jghouse88 I have tested this with the existing tests in IDAES, swapping the new formulation for the old one. All but two tests pass with the new formulation, but the...

@dallan-keylogic What is the status on this PR? We probably want to get this into the November release so that our documentation is up-to-date for the transition.

@dallan-keylogic @eslickj What is the status of the PR? This is one that would be good to get into the release (if we haven't already missed the bus).

@dallan-keylogic Whilst we do want to get the formatting sorted out, for this release I think we should focus on making sure we get rid of the references to default...

@kanishka-ghosh Are you actively working on this? We have a big backlog of inactive PRs and I am trying to clear these up.