andig
andig
@cdyna43 could your give https://github.com/evcc-io/evcc/pull/14824 a try? Fixed a bug that I could reproduce. Der Stand hier wird so noch nicht funktionieren.
This is due to https://github.com/evcc-io/evcc/pull/23571. We may need to revert or improve this.
Citing from #24955 > It is definitly related, although the causes are different: > In my case I have two circuits and Fast mode never goes to 1 phase charging...
No log, no cure 😟. There‘s absolutely no point in posting „bad things happening“ without details about the bad things. It‘s just not actionable.
Braucht einen unit test, dann Lösung.
Klar- Unit Test und dann Lösung bauen :)
Why doesn‘t stopping the mode in https://github.com/evcc-io/evcc/pull/24022/files#diff-0b0f0388fa0ea5962b68de7565e1131be1912c96e6d198ad57f6b53d77775b17R228 suffice?
Hilft es, ein warten auf... "feedback" und "test" label zu haben? Ist Test nicht eine Art von Feedback? Es wäre super, wenn wir keine neuen Labels einführen müssten...
Just another box that violates the OCPP specification. Vendor should fix their code to become compliant.
We could deactivate this validation if necessary.