Jonathon Anderson

Thanks, @rthomson!

Marking as draft pending implementation in the other network management configurations.

Replacing with #1477.

Thanks for the feature request, @jtoddowen! Can you help me understand what specifying the level does at the client-side? I would have expected this to be a BMC-side definition, where...

@NateCrawford I think the behavior of attempting to set up a blank password may be acceptable as a bug; but can you clarify whether you'd consider the injection of a...

Supported in the TSC meeting 7 August 2024.

@mslacken I think you've been talking about this, but I couldn't find an issue about it. If it already exists somewhere, can you point me to it?

I think we probably want to replace this with https://github.com/warewulf/warewulf/issues/831, but I'll add it to a discussion agenda.

Thanks for the PR, @posch! I've added it to the agenda for the next steering committee meeting.

Discussed during 7 August 2024 TSC meeting. - Intent is to put 1-N caching proxies in front of this - griznog: historically we haven’t considered containers private, so this should...