Ammar Bandukwala

Well, it depends on the level of effort we would invest into the human-readable side of the feature. If you look at kubectl or gcloud outputs, all the describe/list outputs...

I think we're aligned actually, and I think I'm guessing too much about the engineering difficulty—that would be better for an engineer to suss out. I think `json` is better...

@tjcran thanks for the review. For our customer base level 0 will be necessary. Perhaps it won't be default in the enterprise plan, but it will certainly be requested often.

@tjcran someone will need someone to build out the feature before I can merge this. I think that should be really easy though, as we just need to add email...

Well, weren't we making it required? I think of this doc as kind of a commitment to the community so would rather merge it after we have these uncertainties worked...

What's the status of this feature?

> This is blocked on being able to actually open a link to a port. I messed up because I thought work on that was underway but it seems actually...

I don't think we can easily assume which parts of the resource object are most relevant to the user.

We can't really make arbitrary API calls (like getting the s3 bucket used) to these clouds. That would couple us heavily with the provisioner environment. So, we're limited to what...

> Sorry, "use" was the wrong word. I meant "allocated," which is something we can know from just our local information. We're targeting quotas to work on workspaces not in...