Amit Dovev

CMake and Autotools should behave similarly, otherwise you make supporting the software more difficult.

Due to the differences between the builds, for Tesseract at least I would prefer that we support just one build system for Linux, macOS,, and the BSDs.

#4026 is one more example for a different behavior of the Autotools build vs. the CMake build.

Which data files did you use? There are three repos of data files: `tessdata`, `tessdata`_fast, `tessdata_best`. Also, there are `eng` and `Latin` data files. You can try and see if...

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/attributes/maybe_unused

https://groups.google.com/g/tesseract-ocr/c/PMHq6YSpRRE @zdenop, In the linked thread you confirmed that `SetRectangle()` is not working as expected.

>I also made `FindLines` public so it can be run directly without running `Recognize` or `AnalyseLayout` first (running `AnalyseLayout` would result in paragraph recognition being run twice). So paragraph detection...

>Why not use leptonica solution? Because it is not necessary. Tesseract does it anyway.

You are right that my suggestion changes the current behavior, so it's not a good idea. I still think we should not expose `FindLines` just to make this use case...

@zdenop, After reading @Balearica's answer to your question, do you object to merging this PR? @stweil, can we merge it?