Amit Dovev

>Will it? I don't think so...

Stefan, will you able to test the code today or in the upcoming days?

>I was surprised because the performance is identical to the AVX2 implementation. This is disappointing. We can also remove the 'ones' vector. The vnni version does not need it.

Did you fetch and merge my commit locally? ``` git switch avx512-vnni git log -1 ``` Do you see my commit?

@bertsky, please update the PR. Maybe @stweil will finally merge it :-)

@bertsky, do you remember this PR?

About the implementation of PSM_AUTO_ONLY. Please consider doing it in another PR.

Last chance before the final release of 5.0.0.

https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract/issues/3331 https://groups.google.com/g/tesseract-ocr/c/pd_8B0wGBZc

My guess is that you didn't normalized the text.