Ahmad Amireh
Ahmad Amireh
It may be that that loader is relying on APIs that happypack can't support (due to having to use IPC to communicate between workers, not all APIs can be supported...
Hmmm. Thank you for the detailed report! That doesn't look right to me either. I can test on a macbook and hopefully I'll see something similar (but most of my...
I'd take this with a grain of salt, but perhaps what's going on when caching is enabled is that we're becoming I/O bound instead of CPU bound so only one...
What's the status on this? Is it fixed by the 4.0.0 release?
Oh, nice catch! They probably should be re-done since the numbers will have slightly increased in 4.0.
Thanks for sharing @AleksandrZhukov ! Will incorporate this along with the new benchmarks I make
Thanks for the patch. Will you be able to find the time to add some tests to cover it? Boring, I know, but! 😀
😲 that sounds terrible and definitely shouldn't happen, can you share config / more info please?
I'm not certain I spot anything suspicious, so let's try a process of elimination. Can you please try this again without the Uglify plugin?
Technically, enabling happypack shouldn't affect the generation of chunks, but maybe it's not working as you expect and then the chunks aren't generated in the first place? It's hard to...