Amir Zeldes

Yes, I had the same thought BUT: * Attaching "not" to "can" treats "can" as the promoted equivalent of the verb (otherwise an AUX would not be allowed to dominate...

From a commonsense perspective I agree completely that that's the most sensible solution. However I would like to see some UD guideline formalize this, for example: > Coordinated auxiliaries should...

> should be solved as coordinate clauses with ellipsis Do you mean with enhanced dependencies and an empty node? But what would you do with the basic graph? Do you...

> nsubj(can-2, what) OK, it looks like you're analyzing this like a question, right? Isn't this a free relative? If it's a question I would expect nsubj:pass (because we are...

I think that's right thank you both! What you say was exactly my problem: I agree @nschneid 's suggestion is sensible, but I also felt it is not what UD...

Sure, same here. I could produce translations of this into a couple of languages where things work sufficiently similarly... But either way I would ideally like to have a live...

Should be obj if unmarked, or obl if there is a promoted obl ADP in the relative clause, but cave: "the day the music died", or "last time I saw...

I would expect yes, since edeps represent structure sharing. I mean, if the relative pronoun is actually there, you are also supposed to have two edges.

Thanks for reporting - the first link should now be working, but the second isn't. I'm afraid that server was recently hit by a cyber-attack, and the wiki containing that...

Thanks for finding that @lgessler ! I should point out however that GUM guidelines are constantly evolving. The guidelines in that snapshot probably correspond to the data in GUM V7,...