Amin Ya

I opened a pull request for backtrace-rs. This should make it possible to rework #122. https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/473

See https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/473 The Rust developers have asked me to copy-paste code to support profiling on Windows. I think that's against software reuse and maintainability fundamentals. Maybe you can review that...

Yeah, I think forking is a better solution than copy-pasting code. I can call the fork something like `backtrace-thread`. @Jardynq I will merge the changes into my branch and publish...

@Jardynq Yeah, if the goal is to merge this, we should probably do so.

The last time I checked the intentions package was quite buggy. For example, it disabled selecting the text, or the underlines were longer than what they should be. I thought...

I got access to the intentions package. We should fix these issues before merging this PR. - [x] https://github.com/steelbrain/intentions/issues/76 - [x] https://github.com/steelbrain/intentions/issues/74 - [x] https://github.com/steelbrain/intentions/issues/77

I tested with back to atom-languageclient 0.99 and older versions of atom-ide-signature-help, and the behavior is the same. Not sure where to look for the problem, but the `getSignatureHelp` function...

We can add `atom-ide-find-references`. The process has been to create a new repository, make it work, then improve upon it. Nuclide packages that may be used by some of them...

We have already been using "atomic" for some of the packages. I think that's a good balance between a new name and keeping the nostalgia of Atom. https://github.com/atom-community?q=atomic&type=all&language=&sort= I'm reluctant...

Not sure if referring to that poll is a good measure. It had scary non-legal descriptions for some of the options that discouraged people from choosing those (e.g. for atomic)....