Amaresh S M

> @nzakas in [#638 (comment)](https://github.com/eslint/eslint.org/pull/638#discussion_r1773436753), did you mean that the generated file should be `includes/sponsors.md`? Yes, it seems that the generated file should be placed inside the `includes` folder.

Writing a script to generate types might be a better approach. I've made a basic implementation. Could you review it to see if it aligns with what you were expecting?...

> > Writing a script to generate types might be a better approach. > > I'm a bit confused, how is that different than what I said? "We should create...

> This looks pretty good! I don't think we need to have the separate files (`best-practices.d.ts`), we can just put everything into a `rules.d.ts`. > > And we should run...

> [@amareshsm](https://github.com/amareshsm) are you still working on this? Apologies for this. I had started working on it but didn’t get the time to complete the implementation, so I’ve unassigned it...

I am working on this PR.

This change looks interesting. If it's accepted, I would be interested in taking on its implementation. I have consolidated my understanding: Passing the text with the BOM removed is generally...

I will work on this. This repository will include the logic to generate and update a file with sponsor content. In the other repositories, we will update the update-readme.js file...

Completed via https://github.com/eslint/eslint.org/pull/638

> @harish-sethuraman That's not a bad idea, but maybe we should rename to just "Share" and have the two options under there? (I supposed reporting an issue is another form...