Issue in Reproducing the same result as mentioned in paper

[TE-ShreenidhiRamachandran]

I ran the command "python3 iSeeBetterTest.py" for evaluation and used netG_epoch_4_1.pth model. Used the foliage_test.txt,calendar_test.txt and city_test.txt as the input for images . I got the PSNR values25.16 , 21.66 , 25.69 respectively But the paper reports 26.57, 24.13, 28.34 respectively I also tried to calculate the PSNR values on all the images in all scenes of Vid. The PSNR I got for foliage ,calendar ,city ,walk is 24.65 , 22.01 , 26.09 , 29.04 respectively which still doesn't match the result reported by the paper Please may I know if I m missing something because of which i m not able to produce the same result

[BLCKEAGLE4]

Did you have any other problems with testing because I'm getting negative PSNR value? I hope this helps you! https://github.com/alterzero/RBPN-PyTorch/issues/48

[TE-ShreenidhiRamachandran]

Did you have any other problems with testing because I'm getting negative PSNR value? Hi ,Thanks alot you for the help. No,I dint face any other issue

[BLCKEAGLE4]

Also, try to use the foliage.txt file, not the foliage_test.txt and respectively for the calendar and city