amalc

Updates to integer custom fields appear to be working. There is a test that passes now. However, it does return a string when queried.

It's a good idea. I'd started on a "map" to manage this and other issues, like non ruby legal field names. But haven't got a chance to finish it. The...

Yup, exactly! On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:26 PM, brenes [email protected] wrote: > Browing in the code I'm seeing that maybe the right place to touch would > be...

Sorry I didn't see this. We have a test Zoho account for testing. And we're very careful about API usage.

No, there isn't but you can sign up for one of the free accounts. Just be careful about running just the one spec, though so you don't use up all...

@brenes Did you get a chance to test this?

No worries. I need to get a new version out as well with the number of records returned fix. On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:01 PM, brenes [email protected] wrote:...

@brenes Had to manually do the merge. Will test and release in the next couple of days. Thanks!

I've got your changes for mapping in master to map between fields. Will release as soon as I test. Thanks for the heads up.

I'll add a reg ex to always generate a legal ruby variable. I take it you're using the mapping fixes you added? If you're processing a field with '/'?