Adam Porter

https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/async.html Having said that, what kind of scenario would this be useful in? i.e. what kind of long-running, CPU-intensive activity would benefit from mapping one-process-per-element of a list?

> I have a network heavy function in mind; Essentially, I have a list of IDs, and I want to get some remote JSON object from them. Doing this sequentially...

This would add an extra function call to the expanded code, so you could use `-->` instead, to avoid that. Of course, sometimes using `->>` is more convenient, and switching...

I stumbled upon this recently: https://github.com/rplevy/swiss-arrows Then I had occasion to use a macro like this, so I thought I'd send it in and see what you thought.

`-tee` might also be an appropriate name, since it's like the `tee` command. Then `--tee` could be an anaphoric version.

Here are some implementations that I've found useful: ```el (defmacro -< (expr &rest forms) "Return a list of EXPR fed through FORMS, inserting it as the last item in each...

As I mentioned on https://github.com/magnars/dash.el/issues/230#issuecomment-489286096, please consider making the return value a cons of two lists: lists of matching items in the CAR, and non-matching items in the CDR. This...

#268 is relevant as well, at least in name.

> Your first example seems to follow a similar pattern, there are some nested lists. Why is it a list of lists... The first list is a list of lists...

I'm glad to see progress being made on this idea! One point I haven't seen addressed in recent proposals is the way matching vs. non-matching lists are presented in the...