Adam Porter
Adam Porter
Hello Frederick, Thanks, this seems like a good idea. However, before adding two more similar commands, I'd like to think about whether an alternative scheme might be more useful (i.e....
> > Thanks, this seems like a good idea. However, before adding two more similar commands, I'd like to think about whether an alternative scheme might be more useful (i.e....
No problem, there's no urgency here. Thanks.
> @alphapapa ok, I just sent them the signed copy. Do you need something else (maybe from them?) AFAIK we need to wait for them to send you a final...
> @alphapapa I just received it, where should I send it? I've since found out that I need to get confirmation from either the FSF secretary or the Emacs maintainers....
Hi, On one hand I can understand that supporting this option would make it convenient to share configuration between `org-ql` and `org-agenda`. However, one of the reasons I wrote `org-ql`...
> However this requires adding new, hard-coded block for every file, removing code when files are deleted/renamed etc. It would be much better if there was a way to generate...
> Thanks. That was my original approach, but I couldn't get it to work. After reading your comment I decided to return to that approach and did get it working....
This is a nicely written bug report, but please see #237, which it duplicates.
Yeah, probably good to have this as an issue, and since you wrote it up so well, might as well use this one. :)