Alok Kumar Sharma

Hi @kiranchandramohan @pawosm-arm, do you have any comments ?

Thanks for working on this. You should get a failure once you re-base it (#1157). Below change should fix that. Can I request you to include below change in your...

> > > Has LLLVM HEAD been changed to allow DW_TAG_string_type as a valid tag now? (That change wasn't allowed to go in when I tried a few years ago,...

> > > It'll be great if the extension has been merged into LLVM HEAD. I am able to verify that extension DW_TAG_string type is present in LLVM HEAD.

> > > It'll be great if the extension has been merged into LLVM HEAD. Please let me know if there is anything pending on me to get this pull...

We need to hold it for now for merging. The opensource LLVM has only partial support not enough to support it. Sorry for my earlier assessment.

Hi @kiranchandramohan , all the tests pass except on ARM, looks like on ARM, LLVM picked is not latest (does not have https://github.com/flang-compiler/classic-flang-llvm-project/pull/75), can you please help me in this...

Hi @bryanpkc @kiranchandramohan, please review/approve this.

Hi @kiranchandramohan , do you have any comment on this ?

Thanks @bryanpkc and @pawosm-arm .