alnoki
alnoki
@davidiw thanks for the above > I'd like to take this more to an AIP as a starting point rather than rush in and create new pains. > Maybe we...
@movekevin @lightmark per offline discussion at Ecosystem summit cc @davidiw Currently, this implementation introduces an adoption gap where someone creates a new FA but can not use it in ~~DeFi~~...
> we open up a new set of behaviors that isn't well studied. @davidiw The main behavior that this enables is creating an account without erroring out There are as...
> Examples, please? > > Why do people want these accounts to exist? @davidiw `account::Account` is required for GUID, txn submission, and auth key rotation
> Option 3, allow u64 => Aggregator* upgradeability: @igor-aptos If this could be done in a backwards-compatible manner then it would probably streamline things the most, however it would generate...
Bumping this as the PR eases DevEx
Bumping again as the PR eases DevEx
Bumping per stale label
> this is pretty straight forward, but what is the motivation? @davidiw enforcing maximum price granularity on decimalized prices, determining precision required to represent a given ratio or figure, calculating...
> biggest difference is how many resources are being read/accessed @igor-aptos If that's the case and if `exists` calls are cheap, then I'd suggest re-architecting structs to look like this:...