Gandalf

@UncleWeeds , can you come up with draft PR on this issue ?

sorry @infotroph , this really went over my head, Have implemented the suggested changes, looking forward to getting it merged

> I'm also cautious about skipping the CI job after merge -- yes, it's theoretically a duplicate of the tests in the merge group, but it does on occasion (once...

@sambhavnoobcoder any update on the current status of your work ?

Can you provide a timeline of when can we expect a complete PR @sambhavnoobcoder ?

hey @Aariq , thanks for the heads up, I have made PR on this one, i would be happy if you can review the PR :) here it is :...

are we close to finishing this PR @deep-poharkar ? it's been a year :)

Closing this PR in favour of https://github.com/PecanProject/pecan/pull/3345, please reopen if you disagree

I also wanted to point that this test would not be limited to just the sipnet model, but in future different models would be tested, for that I have added...

Opps, I had used those parameters as those were mentioned in the documentation to test the workflow , Can you please provide me with the correct parameters to test the...