CCTag (subpixel) accuracy

[anauta00]

Hi,

I have a question about the accuracy of the center position detection in CCTag.

For a specific use, I have coded my own (complicated but functional) center position detection algorithms for concentric circles. It uses OpenCV's feature detection mostly... The accuracy I reach on synthetic images (known center positions) is very good, like <0.05 pixels.

Using CCTag, which I would prefer, the accuracy is less (and the results vary for each run).

Can I improve the accuracy of the CCTag library somehow? Are there some settings I need to change?

Thanks and greetings, Auke Nauta

[OndrejIvancik]

Hi Anauta00, the subpixel accuracy and precision of detection is a bit disapointing in version 1.0.3 especially on generated ideal images. You can easilly find out that the returned positions have negative offset in x and y direction:

These are the deviations between cctag detected and expected positions for all reliable 4-crown markers. Mean offset vector is [-0.3983, -0.340] pixels. The marker images contains one marker with radius 100 pixels, like this:

When you change the parameter _numSamplesOuterEdgePointsRefinement to 100 (cctag::Parameters), the precision will be much better, but now with the offest vector [-0.5151, -0.513]:

This nicely proofs that all the positions are returned with half-pixel error, what I reported some time ago https://github.com/alicevision/CCTag/issues/122. Hopefully it will be fixed in next release. For now you only have to add 0.5 to x and y coordinate to get accurate and precise results with mean offset vector of [-0.0152, -0.011] pixels:

I hope it helps you.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.