Musa Al-hassy

This breakage is likely due to the most recent non-backward-compatiable release of https://github.com/alhassy/org-special-block-extras. - We can either pin the use of this package in our dependenices, - Or we can...

Hey @jasonjckn, - I couldn't reproduce this issue ---but I suspect that may be because I don't use the jshell-maven-plugin. - (Aside: I have alternative approach to this plugin, in...

Hello, > Thank you for the great package. You're very welcome 😁 > I personally enjoy the org-defblock and org-deflink macros very much for defining my own things! I'm glad...

@SPiCaRiA It seems that your problem and that of @RagnarGrootKoerkamp can be solved by _you_ redefining the blocks already conveniently provided by this package, like so: ``` #+begin_details "Proof details"...

@SPiCaRiA Please use the `org-undefblock` macro to remove `org-special-block-extras` support for any block of your choosing. ```emacs-lisp (cl-defmacro org-undefblock (name &rest _) "Remove `org-special-block-extras' support for NAME special blocks. For...

This is a bug. It seems at one point I started using def-method instead of defun to accommodate users who wanted to redefine blocks provided by the package. However, my...

@JohnDevlopment When melpa updates with the latest, please upgrade and try again and confirm that this issue has been resolved. Thanks.

@driftcrow Can you please elaborate on what kind of block you'd like? Perhaps example use would help.

See my this https://github.com/alhassy/CheatSheet for doing cheat sheets, but also the 'parallel' block seems to be what you're looking for. For the other two links you posted, if you can...