Alex Shpilkin

@ameyp Right, I don’t know if this counts as a bug (it certainly seems undesirable), but in any case that’s a different problem: this issue is about different versions of...

Thank you bot, it’s been an ... interesting year, but I do need to get back to this.

@pawks I’m fine doing that, sure. Do you want to make a separate `test_requirements.txt` or just special-case `pytest` for now? (I could even imagine comment-separated sections in the current `requirements.txt`...

Re how to do and specify this, the Haskell people have long ago solved the general case using backtracking. See [Hughes (1995)](http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/pretty.html), [Wadler (1998)](https://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/topics/language-design.html#prettier), discussion in elixir-lang/elixir#1047. There is also,...

Actually, you [can][1] delete a node in a singly linked list in O(1), even if you only have a pointer to that node and not its predecessor. The cost is...

@PeteC1773 I’m glad to see you’re interested, but I have to warn you: the code is kind of in a rough state right now (as can be seen from the...

Not stale, dammit.

@clamydo Currently, the Nixpkgs build system embeds *absolute* paths to dependencies in the build artifacts. As long as that’s true, a Nix store located in a nonstandard location (even if...

@clamydo said: > Hmm, couldn't derivations refer to a substitutable placeholder like `$NIX_STORE_PATH` that is resolved when actually building/instantiating? [...] Today they refer to store paths as Nix generates them...

@wjrsimpson That’s a fair question. While you can tell that there are broken Open Library links at the ORCID website and that the Open Library website as it is now...