Alex Ruiz

I'm sorry, but I'm reverting this change. I don't think this is general enough to be part of FEST. We hope to make FEST easy to extend so users can...

The problem is that the vararg takes an array of T, where it should just an array of Object. For tests it really doesn't matter type safety in the vararg....

You can use FEST-Reflect to extract the field. No need to duplicate that in FEST-Assert. The question would be if FEST-Reflect works with Android. If not, we can fix FEST-Reflect.

isGreaterThan and isLessThan exist only for Comparables, pretty much in assertions for numbers . I fail to understand why would you like to override the Comparable behavior with a Comparator....

I'm sorry, but I don't agree. I can see having the same argument over hasSameSize(byte[]) and all the primitive arrays or some crazy stuff as hasSameSize(String), hasSameSize(StringBuilder). We can revisit...

I meant to change only the return type. If the calling code expects an Iterable, getting a List should work. I need to review the extended use of generics. I...

Please use FEST-Reflect. It can access fields, properties, methods and more, via Reflection. It provides a nice fluent interface too.

I'll be removing ThrowableAssert from the code base. It provide little benefit since anything that you need to check in a Throwable can be done with other assertions.

Pressed "Close" by accident. I'm leaving the issue open in case we'd like to discuss it further.

It is more readable, no doubt. But we cannot provide an assertion for everything. We need to draw the line somewhere. We may reconsider after releasing 2.0.