libertinus
libertinus copied to clipboard
alerque
U+2052 Commercial Minus Sign
Hi
For some season (possibly an error or finger trouble), Google Fonts includes U+2052 Commercial Minus Sign in their Plus, Pro and Expert standards. No other standards from Adobe, Microsoft, or SIL, include that point.
It looks like it is also the only point that is unique to these three standards. I've never actually encountered it in the real world.
Depending on the level you are aiming for for inclusion in Google Fonts, it will have to be added (or persuade them it should not be in the standards).
Cheers, Ian
A commercial what? Add this to the small end of my list of assorted sized beefs with Google Fonts ;-)
cf. https://github.com/google/fonts/issues/12
I suspect the person that compiled their standards lists mistook it for a percentage sign.
Else maybe their programmers use it internally as a "special character used as a divider in .csv files 'cos no one is ever going to type it" in the same way that I use ¬ signs.
It is or was used in Sweden (and perhaps other countries in that region) in two ways: as an equivalent of the minus sign, clearer and more conspicuous than a typewritten ‘-’; and in the margin of a letter to indicate that a document referred to in the text is included as an attachment. Its typed form in the days of typewriters was ‘./.’ .
KDE CharPicker advises:
a common glyph variant and fallback representation looks like ./. may also be used as a dingbat to indicate correctness used in Finno-Ugric Phonetic Alphabet to indicate a related borrowed form with different sound
Which, together with @kimmus' comment, is hardly a convincing case for why Google put it in their Plus/Pro/Expert standards, while Adobe/Linotype/Microsoft/SIL and even the Medieval Unicode Font Initiative don't think it that important.
Conversely, Google completely ignores Actually Useful things like U+207B Superscript Minus.
FWIW, there are some fonts which include that point, the ones competing in the same space as this project include:
African Sans Alegreya AverageMono BabelStone Roman Bitstream Cyberbit Brill Computer Modern, New Computer Modern, Tex Gyre, etc (and Kurinto derivatives) Cantarell Code2000 Code2003 DejaVu EversonMono FreeMono FreeSans FreeSerif Helvetica Helvetica Neue Intel Clear Inter Junicode K1FS Kaius Kelvinch LeedsUni Lucida Grande Lucrecia Serif M 1p / M 2c / M 2p Microsoft Sans Serif Miedinger Book Montserrat Mplus 1p Noto NovaMono Old Standard P22 Underground Pro Book PragmataPro Quivira Roboto STIX SamsungOne Segoe Symbola TITUS Cyberbit Tahoma Times New Roman Tinos Vollkorn Work Sans XITS
Maybe some of the FOSS ones have suitable glyphs and licences ...
Cheers, Ian
Okay after some research and thought, I think it would be good to include this code point at some time, not because it's in Google's standards, but because it's in STIX and Computer Modern. They probably had saner reasons for including it than Google.
Don't think it's urgent:-)
See separate rant about glyph list standards.
Cheers, Ian.
See the discussion in the Unicode Consortium: https://www.unicode.org/mail-arch/unicode-ml/y2014-m01/0018.html
Even worse there's ⸓
U+2E13, Dotted Obelos ....
I couldn't quite follow how they see the commercial minus sign as a variant of ÷ U+00F7 ... that's a division sign to me and nothing to do with "minus" ...
Cheers, Ian