Alexis Hunt
Alexis Hunt
Personally I think I'm inclined to the `mod_path!` workaround, because it allows attaching other attributes from the outside too: ```rust #[deny(...)] lalrpop_mod!(...); ```
Oh, nevermind, this is already supported, just with slightly different syntax. But still, I think that's the more elegant solution anyhow.
Would you be interested in a pull request for this?
Apologies for the slow reply. I think that @masinter is right, and that my concern matches the ones discussed there. I skimmed those threads and a few statements concerned me,...
It's not supported by vanilla BNF, but I would personally be quite satisfied with a grammar taking parameterized rules like you have there. Many modern parser generators can handle them;...
While I unfortunately do not have the time to contribute to any work on this at the moment, I have a few thoughts. 1. First, I agree that care should...
I'm well aware that the test suite is not normative, and that the writing spec is normative, and of the use of "normative" as a term of art. But you...
Most specs aren't defining general technologies that have broad use beyond the network of web standards. This requires a bit more care. The abstract of this spec, for instance, says...
My 2c: This is an excellent example of an issue for which my opinion changes depending on whether this is in the context of a spec for a data format...
Not one that I can share, unfortunately. On Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 10:16 GhidorahRex ***@***.***> wrote: > @alercah Do you have a binary we could test > a fix with?...