Alen Šiljak

Some `node` crags: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12105231950 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12105231931 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12105231932

Here is a `way`, a climbing route: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371517472 I've already added it to a crag relation but I run into these every now and then when editing an area....

And a `node` for `climbing=route_bottom` - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11158594455 that I've also already added to a crag.

Here's a theme park - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142397721

`playground=climbing_wall` - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6725604626 Many of these locations have `sport=climbing` and this is how I can find them in OsmAnd.

Just a node with `sport=climbing`. A beautiful crag, apparently. - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5547433979 The crag next to it is just bare rock: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451865436 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537737249

Here are some routes that are not part of any relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7323423397 I will create a crag now and add them. But would be nice to be able to identify,...

There are also some `climbing=boulder` in OSM, that don't get rendered: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2746353

Thank you! The map indeed looks much better now. Sometimes even overwhelming. :) I was wondering if it would be useful to mark the "invalid" tags somehow (color?) so that...

ah, it would be pretty much anything without `sport=climbing`, I think. Or the old-style `cliff` + `climbing`. Sometimes it is a tourist attraction, leisure, etc. I mainly add the current...