Alessio Buccino

@JoeZiminski I pushed a small fix in hybrid tools! Thanks for adding tests. Let us know when it's done!

Thanks for bringing this up @JoeZiminski I think we should go with better headers for sure! Personally, I like this: ``` ######################################### # Low Level Implementations ######################################### ```

I vote for 3, 1, 2, @h-mayorquin @yger your votes are needed for democracy!

@jonahpearl Can you try with this? ``` os.environ["OPENBLAS_NUM_THREADS"] = "1" ```

yes but that is very tricky given the current implementation!

Also the structure of analyzers folders/part paths!

Hi @JarrodDowdall Thanks for the issue! The implementation is actually correct. The `spikes` array in fact uses `unit_index`, and not `unit_id`. In your example, `unit_id` 13 will show up as...

I think we don't have a good option to instantiate the random spike extension with user-provided indices. @JarrodDowdall would this option enable you to use the `SortingAnalyzer`?

The run info dict is instantiated with the object, so there is no need to save it before it has run. Is it triggering a specific error for you? All...

Hi @JerryChen1974 I don't think this is due to size, but rather to a recent breaking change of numcodecs (see https://github.com/SpikeInterface/spikeinterface/pull/3845) Make sure your python environment is not using the...