Alberto Bertogli

I've just uploaded the first iteration of internal DKIM support to the `next` branch. It's commit 404fc07040dc7e7db1969b7d3707daaafe90007a (but expect the id to change as I rebase things over time). It'll...

Thanks for opening this! Sorry it took a while to reply. The current behaviour is a consequence of having to handle more complex cases, such that an alias that goes...

I took a quick look. Due to the way the alias resolution works today, rejecting early when an alias only has local destinations and they're not valid is not particularly...

Thanks for sending this! On a quick look, this seems totally reasonable. I am probably going to do a quick pass on the top-1000 domains just to check this isn't...

I did a review pass and left a few minor comments, but overall structure and approach seems totally fine to me. I'm not that familiar with github reviews so let...

> The stand out comment in this is > > > replies to all queries related to SPF have to be evaluated to fit in a single 512-octet UDP packet...

Thanks for reporting this! > I've just received an email with no cipher overlap, so the email was rejected. The logged message was: > > ``` > STARTTLS failed: 554...

> The entire log I got for the transaction was: > > ``` > May 15 15:07:54 _ conn.go:251 SMTP.Conn xxx.xxx.xxx.129:58698: error: STARTTLS failed: 554 5.5.0 Error in TLS handshake:...

Hi! Thank you for opening this, sorry it took me so long to triage it. This seems like a very reasonable feature request, will leave this open to track it...

Hi Parthka! Unfortunately, I'll need a bit more information to understand why the check is failing: at least the IP address of the sender, and the domain in question. You...