[Question] Support for devices at storage level with no deviceclasses

[leelavg]

• I can think of a usecase for below CR, like, specific devices from specific nodes but no deviceClass from the nodes. Just checking whether it's intentional not to support below type or is it any bug?

---
apiVersion: topolvm.cybozu.com/v2
kind: TopolvmCluster
metadata:
  name: sample-cr
  namespace: topolvm-system
spec:
  topolvmVersion: "quay.io/topolvm/topolvm-with-sidecar:0.10.2"
  storage:
    # single device class with nodename, devices at storage level
    useAllNodes: false
    useAllDevices: false
    useLoop: false
    devices:
      - name: "/dev/nvme1n1"
        type: "disk"
      - name: "/dev/nvme2n1"
        type: "disk"
      - name: "/dev/nvme3n1"
        type: "disk"
      - name: "/dev/nvme4n1"
        type: "disk"
    deviceClasses:
      - nodeName: "ip-10-0-146-72.ap-south-1.compute.internal"
        classes:
          - volumeGroup: test-master
            className: hdd
            default: true

[little-guy-lxr]

Temporarily unsupported that specific node deviceclass without providing devices.
manage volume groups created by users has added in roadmap.