Alastair Campbell

> Speaking of which, @alastc isn't it jumping the gun to have updated the 2.1 information when 2.2 isn't even at PR yet? Ah, *!£$, correct, that shouldn't have gone...

> This example should be a failure since bday-day must be a numeric input type and is [not allowed](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#inappropriate-for-the-control) for type="tel". Assuming you mean pass/fail of WCAG, it would only...

Hi @vavroom, I checked in with the COGA task force and we obviously all agree that making the content as easy to understanding as possible is very important. There have...