AlvaAR
AlvaAR copied to clipboard
alanross
Created a react-three-fibre R3F example
Hi @alanross ,
I've created a R3F example that works (after a fashion). I've got everything on a branch and if you are interested would create a PR. Just let me know if you would like to have the branch pushed to your repo or if I should fork and open a PR from the fork. Cheers
Awesome, thank you Thorsten! Can you hold on to it and keep it warm for now so we can integrate it once the architecture is better defined?
Sure thing, I'll push to a fork and keep it there. I'd also have a couple of questions as to why the model shows the way it shows :). How are you getting along with the architecture. Need any help?
What would you like to know about how the model is shown? If you have any system architecture suggestions on the C++ side I'd be happy to check it out
Hi @alanross I pushed it here https://github.com/ThorstenBux/AlvaAR/tree/thor-r3f here is a screenshot regarding model placement.
It looks like the model is at an angle and not sitting on the surface. Unsure if that is due to my camera/model settings in R3F or if it is due to the data coming from AlvaAR.
Lastly, I'm also getting a lot of these errors randomly:
RangeError: Range consisting of offset and length are out of bounds
set — alva_ar.js:6372
write — alva_ar.js:6372
findCameraPose — alva_ar.js:6527
(anonymous function) — useAlvaAR.tsx:91
render$1 — index-7dbf758c.esm.js:1454
loop — index-7dbf758c.esm.js:1481
650set — alva_ar.js:6372
Would you know why that is. Cheers
IMU integration will handle orientation. The SLAM algorithm itself has no notion of its orientation in regards to its environment and will just use the first found frame as its reference.
It looks like the model is at an angle and not sitting on the surface. Unsure if that is due to my camera/model settings in R3F or if it is due to the data coming from AlvaAR.
Would you know why that is. Cheers
actually when you test the official example, the 3d object is never "sitting" on the plane, rather always floating.
actually when you test the official example, the 3d object is never "sitting" on the plane, rather always floating.
I think this is because the video frame is shown before the tracking is ready and can update the 3D mesh, so it just lags behind the video basically. The tracking is quite stable and surprisingly performant.
Lastly, I'm also getting a lot of these errors randomly:
RangeError: Range consisting of offset and length are out of bounds set — alva_ar.js:6372 write — alva_ar.js:6372 findCameraPose — alva_ar.js:6527 (anonymous function) — useAlvaAR.tsx:91 render$1 — index-7dbf758c.esm.js:1454 loop — index-7dbf758c.esm.js:1481 650set — alva_ar.js:6372Would you know why that is. Cheers
you initialized alva twice :)
