blur-admin [Question] - Do you have the raw html (non-angular) version?

Hi,

This is a very very nice looking theme, do you have the html version (non-angular) version? Thanks!

Apr 10 '16 07:04 edwinyzh

Hi @edwinyzh, unfortunately no, but if a lot of people want vanilla.js version we'll do it with pleasure.

Apr 10 '16 08:04 KostyaDanovsky

Hi Konstantin,

Actually I'm interesting using it as a template for creating a website, as opposed a webapp, so I'm interested in the raw html files that looks like http://akveo.com/blur-admin

:)

On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Konstantin Danovsky < [email protected]> wrote:

Hi @edwinyzh https://github.com/edwinyzh, unfortunately no, but if a lot of people want vanilla.js version we'll do it with pleasure.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/akveo/blur-admin/issues/4#issuecomment-207947902

Best Regards, Edwin Yip

Apr 10 '16 10:04 edwinyzh

@edwinyzh Unfortunately we don't have HTML files for this template as we were doing Angular version right away

Apr 11 '16 06:04 lugovsky

@lugovsky Да, чистая HTML версия этого шаблона была бы как нельзя кстати. Очень красивая!

Apr 11 '16 12:04 extensionsapp

@edwinyzh The problem is that raw HTML still will require a lot of javascript for navigation, initialization of widgets etc. In my eyes it's completely new project.

But maybe we'll think about doing some "light" version with blurred panels.

Anyway I'll reopen issue to see how big interest is

Apr 11 '16 12:04 lugovsky

+1

Apr 11 '16 14:04 jamatos

+2

Apr 12 '16 19:04 junaidrao

+3

Apr 13 '16 11:04 hooloovooo

Apr 14 '16 09:04 GSWemigo

Apr 14 '16 12:04 Schrims

Please use the 'reaction' button instead of the +1 spam.

Apr 14 '16 12:04 jdpnielsen

+1 do it in Aurelia-Typescript-Webpack! yaaaaaa :)

Apr 16 '16 15:04 lynsei

+1

Apr 30 '16 03:04 gadzan

+1

May 09 '16 19:05 Stereotip42

+1

May 12 '16 14:05 gaetanbuellet

No, I don't have , unfortunately

Четверг, 12 мая 2016, 17:14 +03:00 от Gaetan Buellet [email protected]:

+1 — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

May 12 '16 14:05 Stereotip42

+1

May 20 '16 08:05 scratcher28

+1

Jun 08 '16 04:06 AllyW

++ It would be fantastic !

Jun 10 '16 08:06 pmdlt

+1 for Mint version

Aug 22 '16 17:08 ursuleacv

Yes a raw html and js version would be better, I initially thought you could run gulp or grunt to build the compressed css and js files then you would not need all those dependencies once you were finished with your customisations. You cant really use this for any applcation because for the app I want to use it for it would not be a good idea to include all those bower components etc.