Anastasios Kichidis
Anastasios Kichidis
> I took another look at the `Core::process_own_header()` logic. My understanding is that it broadcasts a header and collects votes in a best effort manner. If the header cannot collect...
> Have the remaining nodes retried their headers? Since the "crashed" nodes have acked the headers , then the "healthy" nodes won't have a reason to retry. Also, there is...
> > > Have the remaining nodes retried their headers? > > > > > > Since the "crashed" nodes have acked the headers , then the "healthy" nodes won't...
> if the honest submission is in the past, then we have a contradiction: we should not find ourselves in this code path, because we should pick up that this...
> I also have a question about wrapping/unwrapping subdag into shell - why did you chose to do it this way? Would it be easier/less error prone if we just...
@asonnino don't have any other comments from my side. My only comment is whether you want to deploy this in one of our environments (ex private testnet or the labnet)...
> However you prefer (no strong feelings). Although It seems that I cannot merge it since there still seems to be an issue with the Typescript SDK Yeah that's a...
> Where is the new store? Is it possible you forgot to push the file? Apologies @asonnino @mwtian - apparently a `.gitignore`(in SUI dir) rule was excluding anything under the...
Will close this as the code has now been refactored there.
This is now quite old and maybe not relevant given the current status/issues we observe. Closing in favour of more recent efforts.