Åke Sandgren

Ok, I can fix that...

@boegel is that split good enough for you?

Don't know. #10965 won't work for us so I'll need to keep this one anyway.

@boegelbot Please test @ generoso

This should eventually use UCX-CUDA when that stuff is completely in place (which should be soon)

And add a HPL and OSU-Micro-Benchmarks built on top of this so we can test it.

This is now tripping up in tools/module_naming_scheme/hierarchical_mns.py:det_modpath_extensions line 231

@boegel I think we might need some guidance here... When it is trying to build CUDA-11.3.1-NVHPC-21.5.eb the hmns code sees CUDA and in det_modpath_extensions we have non_system_cuda = true, entering...

Test report by @akesandgren Using easyblocks from PR(s) https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks/pull/2809 **SUCCESS** Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total) b-an02.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux Ubuntu 20.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU...

to be specific, g77 and gfortran have different ways of returning some function values and they are not compatible. But on the other hand, noone should be using g77 today...