Akash Askoolum

> We discussed this change internally and agreed it makes sense to be able to query the workflow YAML via JSON syntax as suggested in the issue https://github.com/cloudquery/cloudquery/issues/16850. Ah excellent....

> I'll hope to get this done this week. Pushed an update now. I've not written much Go, so any feedback on code style, etc welcomed!

> OK added [7b90067](https://github.com/cloudquery/cloudquery/commit/7b9006747a3de346d3d74abec720290c48bdafa8) as I don't think we should fail if YAML parsing fail. We should still keep the text content. If that makes sense to you I'll go...

Ooh! This doesn't sound ideal! Could we add more detail and/or an example of where you've witnessed this behaviour please?

I'm not sure we're at the recommendation stage yet? Should we add this to the proposal doc instead for now? cc @guardian/devx-operations.