Arthur Vickers
Arthur Vickers
I'll start by saying thank you to the amazing team I work with. I've been working with most of you for many years now, and I'm so grateful for that....
This is apparently by design: - https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/blob/adf3a1309775f655fd4596237c2f7bb58961661e/test/EFCore.Tests/ModelBuilding/OneToManyTestBase.cs#L931 - https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/pull/23195 We should decide if this is also okay for ad-hoc types, which are always keyless.
Note from triage: leave behavior unchanged for normal keyless types, but throw in validation for ad-hoc types.
See also #25872.
@maxkoshevoi We discussed this in triage; there isn't an easy way to do this now, but we agree that it would be useful. Notes from triage: * Issue #22105 covers...
@justindbaur We discussed this and we don't think it makes sense to have this be part of the `add` command. It's really not the same concept.
@bricelam Could you add your thoughts here?
Note from triage. This issue is still tracking having a command-line experience for asking specifically if there are pending migrations A command that returns zero if there are no pending...
@RoderickIveans We appreciate the effort here, but it doesn't seem like what you are implementing is what is described in issue #29711. Perhaps you could describe in your own words...
@roji Thanks--there's definitely a lot of value in doing this. the comparative doc is very useful--we would have to figure out what to do for SQL Server.