aiuto

Friendly ping.

Could we get this PR going again. I am trying to set up the CI runs for rules_license, but my tests are failing completely in a way I don't understand....

Hi. Friendly ping. I need to get CI running for rules_license now that bazel depends on it.

Which flag, what log? And why 3.4.1? I thought the next release was 3.5? On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 10:37 AM Philipp Wollermann wrote: > Pinging the flag owners...

That's strange. I don't know why the rpm flag is not there. I can't speak about the other. I removed the label. It will be removed in 4.0 in any...

Yes! I didn't know about the graveyard. That should have been part of the incompatible flag policy docs from the beginning. The only change I would make is that when...

cc: @danielmachlab I like this one better than the other PR.

This is quite annoying. - The primary setup method `rules_jvm_external_deps()` calls `maven_install` to create the repo `rules_jvm_external_deps` - so maven_install can't load the the classifier repository unless that was created...

I don't know. I don't really like that you need a third setup function for this repository. I want to get the @license_checker repository injected by one of the first...

FYI, the Bazel team has been actively working on the combined problems of precise OSS license attestation, compliance audit, and SBOM generation. The tools will be landing in bazel, rules_license,...