can't reproduce cifar10

[twmht]

Can't reproduce cifar10 result.

Here is mine

without stn: 78.3% with stn: 76.7%

Any idea?

[aicaffeinelife]

What optimizer are you using?

[twmht]

sgd

[twmht]

Does this code can reproduce the result?

[aicaffeinelife]

yeah, this code uses Adam optimizer. Can you try using that? If not I'll take a closer look again

Thanks

[twmht]

@aicaffeinelife

I use adam and still can't repoduce the result

without stn: 78.4 with stn: 76.1

[aicaffeinelife]

Interesting, I'm traveling at the moment, I'll check the code again and update you about it in a couple of days. In the mean time, if you find any bug in the code, let me know.

[tkone2018]

hello,when the epoch=82,the value is 77.3,after epoch=82,the value is very low,i don't know how to interpret it,can you help me ?ths

[tkone2018]

can you teach me how to use the STN with vgg16 or resnet50?ths

[aicaffeinelife]

@tkone2018 open a separate issue for this one. Using STN in any CNN is easy, but it's not relevant to this thread.

[aicaffeinelife]

@twmht I just cloned the repo and re-ran experiments on the hardware mentioned in README.md. I got 78.19% accuracy. What hardware were you using?

[tkone2018]

@aicaffeinelife ok

[twmht]

@aicaffeinelife

GTX-1080

[aicaffeinelife]

@twmht that is strange. Can you share your params.json here?