Alexandre Gramfort
Alexandre Gramfort
option b) seems the way to go for me > Message ID: ***@***.***> >
yes it would be great to grow the model zoo here ! @Buddies-as-you-know can you give us a hand ?
you have now EEGClassifier and EEGRegressor. I would try to be consistent so EEGDataset so an EEGClassifier will be fed by an EEGDataset.
+1 to migrate to more standard implementations but each change deserves a check of non-regression on a relevant task. Maybe MOABB can help with this? > Message ID: github.com> >
it was introduced when we created the EvokedArray class. > Message ID: ***@***.***> >
make an EvokedArray as done eg by read_evoked_besa > Message ID: ***@***.***> >
Evoked only knows nave so not the number of dropped. The Epochs do know this. Yes you could use the comment for this... > Message ID: ***@***.***> >
@alexrockhill ok for you?
both would work for me but maybe a better default is enough? > Message ID: ***@***.***> >
see >>> basename = "toto" >>> name_ext = ".txt" >>> "%s_div%%i%s" % (basename, name_ext) 'toto_div%i.txt' >>> f"{basename}_div%i{name_ext}" 'toto_div%i.txt' so f"{basename}_div%i{name_ext}" should be the correct replacement. Message ID: ***@***.***> >