Possible PR: option to use well name in place of UWI

[rgmyr]

We've been using the HTML table Project method to QC a log dataset (great feature, btw!). Most of the wells in the dataset have names but not UWIs, so I added the option to well names instead of UWIs as the "identifier".

I added names (which acts like uwis) and identifier (one of {'uwi', 'name'}) arguments to Project.curve_table_html, as well as @property Project.names and @property Well.name. These are implemented just like Project.uwis and Project.uwi, respectively.

Just wanted to flag this as a possible enhancement and see if there are any issues with PRing that, or other places in the code where things should be modified to reflect those additions.

[kinverarity1]

The other thing that might be nice is an ability to provide a function to parse the UWI (or name) from the well header. Many wells in my dataset have what are essentially UWIs stored in a range of three or four sometimes missing fields.

I'd be happy to work on that as a PR, following any suggestions or notes here...

[atwahsz]

this is definitely needed