Arturo Guadalupi

_From @CzechM8 on December 20, 2012 18:2_ Shouldn't this be closed? It was fixed 9 months ago.

_From @CzechM8 on January 4, 2013 17:48_ Never mind, this is different issue - a race condition, state model, or maybe a firmware bug. However, the fix in the link...

_From @stevstrong on March 18, 2015 17:24_ HI, I know, it is an old topic, but I have a very similar issue. I have a W5500 module connected to a...

_From @ferobred on April 20, 2015 10:49_ Hi, I have the same problem as @stevstrong In every connection with the server I close the connection with "client.stop()", But only works...

_From @stevstrong on July 9, 2015 14:33_ It seems that I could solve the problem with the following approach: ``` ctime = millis() + TIMEOUT_REPLY; // time within to get...

_From @matthijskooijman on September 21, 2015 9:18_ I wonder if the intent was to let a user call `stop()` unconditionally before reusing a socket, to prevent accidentally reusing a socket?...

_From @Apollon77 on September 21, 2015 9:28_ The check in "connect" at the beginning is simply checking the current EthernetClient instance because it only checks that a valid Socket-number is...

_From @sngl on February 28, 2014 16:30_ Hi @mji83, the code is written on the basis that you can't change dinamically the HOST_NAME string so the hardcoded assumption is not...

_From @matthijskooijman on November 8, 2014 14:42_ Hm, interesting. I wonder if there are any official recommendations (e.g. RFCs) on picking a source port...

_From @jonface on November 8, 2014 14:57_ Closest I've found, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6056 , I can't find anything which mentions NAT gateways in particular, maybe we are just meant to know this....