cubical icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cubical copied to clipboard

#885: Update README, inform about reviewing

Open felixwellen opened this issue 1 year ago • 14 comments

See #885

felixwellen avatar Aug 11 '22 07:08 felixwellen

How about including our Github handles together with our names?

mortberg avatar Aug 11 '22 09:08 mortberg

How about including our Github handles together with our names?

Yes - but I would turn the list into a table then...

felixwellen avatar Aug 11 '22 09:08 felixwellen

I like it - what do you think: https://github.com/felixwellen/cubical/tree/885_update_readme#reviewing-of-pull-requests

felixwellen avatar Aug 11 '22 09:08 felixwellen

I sorted stuff in the README by topic and threw in some headlines. Someone with knowledge of this stuff should look at it: @mortberg

felixwellen avatar Aug 11 '22 09:08 felixwellen

Everything looks good to me. Will it be possible that people request reviews from me, without me being able to merge PRs?

mzeuner avatar Aug 11 '22 12:08 mzeuner

Everything looks good to me. Will it be possible that people request reviews from me, without me being able to merge PRs?

Sure, you can review and someone else merges

mortberg avatar Aug 12 '22 07:08 mortberg

@ecavallo What do you want listed as your area of expertise? Most things?

mortberg avatar Aug 12 '22 07:08 mortberg

Most things is fine.

ecavallo avatar Aug 12 '22 07:08 ecavallo

@ecavallo What do you want listed as your area of expertise? Most things?

I guess you mean the same as you area of expertise, which is "Most topics"?

felixwellen avatar Aug 12 '22 07:08 felixwellen

Putting this back to 'draft' - maybe it is better, if we actually use the 'Assign' field of the PRs. That way it is much easier, to get an overview of unassigned PRs and we could use the convention that whoever is assigned to an PR should take care of finding a reviewer or whatever else there might be to do (so a bit like the editor-role, but it is ok to review something yourself).

felixwellen avatar Aug 16 '22 15:08 felixwellen

Putting this back to 'draft' - maybe it is better, if we actually use the 'Assign' field of the PRs. That way it is much easier, to get an overview of unassigned PRs and we could use the convention that whoever is assigned to an PR should take care of finding a reviewer or whatever else there might be to do (so a bit like the editor-role, but it is ok to review something yourself).

Yeah, I was wondering what the point of assigning PRs was... So should we go for assigning in addition to requesting?

mortberg avatar Aug 19 '22 08:08 mortberg

Is this ready to be merged?

mortberg avatar Aug 19 '22 11:08 mortberg

There was one open question: Should we make use of assigning PRs? But I'll write an issue for that and we discuss it on the next meeting. So, yes, ready to merge.

felixwellen avatar Aug 19 '22 12:08 felixwellen

Done: #905

felixwellen avatar Aug 19 '22 12:08 felixwellen

Merging this now. Thanks for writing it all up!

mortberg avatar Aug 21 '22 16:08 mortberg

algebra for Max and synthetic homotopy/cohomology theory for Axel.

how about including our Github handles with our names?

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022, 11:07 Felix Cherubini @.***> wrote:

@.**** commented on this pull request.

In README.md https://github.com/agda/cubical/pull/887#discussion_r943261954:

-Build Status +* Andrea Vezzosi (inactive)

I added them. Any hints for their topics?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/agda/cubical/pull/887#discussion_r943261954, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIE27NHPVT23GI7YS2NSYTVYS7DPANCNFSM56HD6XEA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

mortberg avatar Oct 11 '22 09:10 mortberg