Almog Gavra

@mjsax dammit 😂 EDIT: in all seriousness though, I need to think about it a little bit more..

Summary of quick offline discussion. I think agree that this is a bug given the most recent update that Matthias posted. The ideal semantic should be to look into the...

Thanks @MichaelDrogalis - it looks like we have a minor consensus. I'll update the docs in the 0.14 timeline and we can leave this ticket open after (I'll remove documentation...

Hey @ChenZhaobin can you clarify what you mean by "20000 insert into queries"? Are you trying to running 20k concurrent `INSERT INTO ...` statements, are there 20k events going through...

@jaceklaskowski this is the right place to ask these questions :) I see why that might be confusing, the error message is telling you three things: 1) the type of...

@walterddr @Jackie-Jiang I did a survey of other systems and put the results in this doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dvz7NJ2eliIFm6O1Ra4Azs_WFWR98kHOyDCznIwaXow/edit# My vote is also to follow the Postgres standard, though @Jackie-Jiang is right...

I think we should consider our thread utilization end-to-end. Specifically, in our multistage engine if we consider all the operators between a `MailboxReceiveOperator` and a `MailboxSendOperator` as a single "stage"...

Had some a quick discussion with @walterddr and wanted to jot down those thoughts here so I don't forget: - there's two orthogonal design considerations: there's parallelism within a pipe/stage...

Adding notes from offline discussion with @walterddr @61yao @siddharthteotia. Feel free to add additional details if I missed anything. Design notes: 1. the shared buffer itself should have a notion...

Putting a link to a design doc here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XAMHAlhFbINvX-kK1ANlzbRz4_RkS0map4qhqs1yDtE I'll schedule a design review, if anyone following this ticket would like to be a part of it just ping me...