afourney
Will replace this with a future PR.
> wondering if this needs to be passed into `cost` or if we can just pass all the args into the client constructor (as I believe is already done?) and...
> Should we force or at least warn user to pass in token_cost if they are using azure? > > From my previous experience azure always return 'gpt-4' in response['model'],...
Closing this PR, since it is quite dated. Will open a new issue.
What about the device metrics packet? Those are more frequent, and it could just be one bit (is a client currently connected)?
> For example, what could be done is send an additional bool with the ACK on a direct message that indicates whether there is currently a client connected to the...
Looks promising. @MauroDruwel **Can you please add some test cases?** Also, sanitizing filenames is a task that will come up a lot (and my already be implemented). I'm going to...
This looks very promising. Thank you. (Also with #1184) Perhaps the two of you can discuss the differences, and we arrive at the best. But, before that: I need to...
#1929 also introduces audio transcription in the context of documents in the websurfer. I'm willing to adjust that PR to use the same libraries or configurations or helper methods, but...
> @afourney collaboration is definitely a good idea for adding audio support. I'll message you on Discord as soon as I go through #1929 Sounds good. 1929 is big, and...