afontenot

@kmhcreative I strongly agree that indenting is the preferable solution to this issue. I *think*, however, that other ideas are being considered here because this option was previously considered and...

Something worth pointing out: posts already have a `data-id=""` attribute. I wonder if someone put in a pull request to add a `data-reply-id` attribute to identify the post being replied...

> It makes a big assumption that the _first_ person someone mentions in their reply is the main person they're addressing, and ignores any other mentions (kind of like if...

I want to thank @kmhcreative for the inspiration; I've done my own version of this as a user script. It shows reply depth with 100% accuracy and styles threads using...

> Just tried out your script on some very long threads, worked like a charm for most of them, but occasionally would fail to run. Not sure if that's a...

@brendanjones If I'm not mistaken, the only workable solutions offered in this thread so far are 1. Indented threads 2. Restricting depth to level 1 3. Restricting depth to level...

@kmhcreative I think this definitely needs an official fix. It affects all Mastodon users, not just those who are comfortable or capable of using user scripts. Scripts are much less...

> FYI I'm not against at least exploring restricting reply depth (visually) as a solution, but as I mentioned https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/19570#issuecomment-1327770713 I think they're probably out of scope for this issue....

@deajan looks like you were expecting a ping for https://github.com/andrewchambers/bupstash/releases/tag/v0.12.0 but didn't get one, I'd be curious to see how this release changes your benchmark.

I'm marking this as a draft because it's definitely unfinished (needs work on tests, etc), and also some feedback. I realize BIP39 may not be the best theoretical wordlist approach,...