Andreas Fackler

Yes, exactly, that's also sequential. And even if they weren't, we'd again have to be very careful to keep execution deterministic. :thinking:

It's not planned right now to execute transactions in parallel. #2037's motivation is that the "result of the first operation is passed to the second operation", so that, at least,...

> isn't each individual transaction proposed with the regards to the parent block execution state No, it's applied to whatever the execution state looks like after the previous transaction. It's...

> I meant according to the client with non executed block, who doesn't know transaction outcome. OK, you're right, it _is_ different than in e.g. Ethereum: There, the client cares...

Thank you for the suggestions! I'll mark this PR as a draft since it's not meant to be merged in the current state (lots of `todo!()`s) and requires a few...