add inline annotation

[peternavr]

In mgo's driver they have an inline annotation (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/mgo/v2/view/head:/bson/bson.go#L442)

I propose this is added. The issue is otherwise an added structure is treated like a json object and you can't add a second query to any of it.

[khaf]

Thanks for your suggestion. Will look into it.

[GeertJohan]

So you're proposing that:

type Foo struct {
    FooA int
    FooB Bar    `aerospike:",inline"`
    FooC string `aerospike:"ccc"`
}
type Bar struct {
    A int
    B string
}

Results in the bins:

• FooA
• FooB.A
• FooB.B
• ccc

That does sound interesting!

[GeertJohan]

Or could also become the bins:

• FooA
• A
• B
• ccc

But I like that less. It will cause a conflict when a field named A is added to the Foo struct.

[khaf]

It's the latter, and that's why this issue is on the back burner.

[narqo]

I'd like to +1 on the issue.

Current API seems a bit wasteful in 100% of our cases: the aerospike-client returns BinMaps, that're map[string]interface{}, and we convert them into strictly typed objects.

As an example, being able to pass a zero-value struct that implements, a hypothetical BinSerDer, to read-methods, will reduce the number of temporal allocations.

[khaf]

@narqo I'm working on a solution along those lines, but with a dash of code generation. Does that sound good to you?