Rohitt Vashishtha

I had started a thread at https://chat.zulip.org/#narrow/stream/127-integrations/topic/.2314228.20Bots.20in.20Group.20PMs After the changes:  Before the changes: 

I was on the fence for using `selection` here, but the typeahead function is called `this.select()` so it made sense to follow the convention and say `trigger_selection`. Anyway, updated the...

@neiljp should I rebase this or this feature isn't needed now?

I'll do a little bit of a self review on this: - [ ] We should probably abstract the message sending functionality in `MessageBox.respond_to_submessage(key)` and avoid having to expose 2...

I can, sure. I was just looking to add some tests to the codebase however and thought "hey, if its one of the supported methods to specify plugins, maybe it...

Sorry, I'd gotten out of the project and lost track of these. I'll try and test/merge this when I have time soon. I should be free this. Saturday.

Yes, this is still available. There haven't been any updates on this front.

Thanks, updated the list.

No, it can be rebased as needed after this issue has been closed. For things like realm_filters, we can use terms like custom_filters, as we use in the webapp.

We should convert the source to typescript and in the publishing process, create a `index.d.ts` file to provide type declarations for our compiled js module. I think a good way...