Adrian Price-Whelan

The reason is not that it's prettier, but rather that it doesn't really make sense for astropy to maintain a progress bar utility. For the sake of the open-source community...

@astrofrog I would say dependency. If `tqdm` is not installed, I think the user could live without a progress bar? The Astropy `ProgressBar` class is only used in [astropy/utils/data.py](https://github.com/astropy/astropy/blob/master/astropy/utils/data.py) and...

> a case where the script is changed, but you still want to ignore it? Yes, exactly!

`ancient()` flag is here: https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/stable/snakefiles/rules.html#ignoring-timestamps Within draft mode, do we want to apply this more globally for output files so that even data files don't get re-generated if their outputs...

Sure! I think there is some duplication with Cecilia's work in galstreams, but one doesn't always need the full galstreams footprint, so I'm happy to include these here. ~~I left...

Oh, and could you add a changelog entry? Thanks for this!

I totally forgot about this! I'm going to release v1.8 this week -- should we get this in? Rebase and remove the draft status?

Sorry for the long delay on this @nstarman -- it fell off my radar! Thanks for this.

No! I should remove the origin parameter for this potential, but (as we discussed earlier :)) also see the bug in #339

FWIW, my thoughts: - "Coco: Only one person from each employer, unless" -- agreed, this could be removed. - "Term limits for Coco" -- I think one term is too...