Baileys
Baileys copied to clipboard
adiwajshing
[BUG] Nine Digit in Brazil
In Brazil, there was an update a few years ago that added a ninth digit, adding a 9 to the left on mobile numbers...
I'm facing a problem where onwhatsapp returns true both with and without 9... Some require it not to have it and others yes...
My number, for example, if I send a message with 9, it generates a chat with a ghost account (non-existent)... and the message doesn't get anywhere... Other accounts only receive if you send with 9.
Help-me!
In Brazil, there was an update a few years ago that added a ninth digit, adding a 9 to the left on mobile numbers...
I'm facing a problem where onwhatsapp returns true both with and without 9... Some require it not to have it and others yes...
My number, for example, if I send a message with 9, it generates a chat with a ghost account (non-existent)... and the message doesn't get anywhere... Other accounts only receive if you send with 9.
Help-me!
@JoaoNetoDev you can get the result onWhatsApp method and read the jid field that already returns corrected, I suggest replacing the jid by the one returned in this method, here it works for me.
My number only receives if I send it with 8 digits, but this function returns the incorrect ID, see the example below of the return it gave me:
{ "error": false, "date": true, "idWpp": "[email protected]" }
In Brazil, there was an update a few years ago that added a ninth digit, adding a 9 to the left on mobile numbers... I'm facing a problem where onwhatsapp returns true both with and without 9... Some require it not to have it and others yes... My number, for example, if I send a message with 9, it generates a chat with a ghost account (non-existent)... and the message doesn't get anywhere... Other accounts only receive if you send with 9. Help-me!
@JoaoNetoDev you can get the result onWhatsApp method and read the jid field that already returns corrected, I suggest replacing the jid by the one returned in this method, here it works for me.
In Brazil, there was an update a few years ago that added a ninth digit, adding a 9 to the left on mobile numbers... I'm facing a problem where onwhatsapp returns true both with and without 9... Some require it not to have it and others yes... My number, for example, if I send a message with 9, it generates a chat with a ghost account (non-existent)... and the message doesn't get anywhere... Other accounts only receive if you send with 9. Help-me!
@JoaoNetoDev you can get the result onWhatsApp method and read the jid field that already returns corrected, I suggest replacing the jid by the one returned in this method, here it works for me.
Tell me more about your test logic... because for me it returns Jid both with the ninth digit and without... false positive!
I'm thinking of testing without the ninth digit and only adding the 9 to the left if it returns false, because I think that those that are mandatory to add the nine give an error if you test with only 8 digits
fix DDD in Brasil
const jid = req.body.jid; const numberDDI = jid.substr(0, 2); const numberDDD = jid.substr(2, 2); const numberUser = jid.substr(-8, 8); const message = req.body.message;
if (numberDDI !== '55') { SendMessage(jid, { text: message }) .then(response => { res.status(200).json({ status: true, response: response }); }) .catch(err => { res.status(500).json({ status: false, response: err }); }); }
if (numberDDI === '55' && numberDDD <= 30) { const number = "55" + numberDDD + "9" + numberUser + "@s.whatsapp.net"; SendMessage(number, { text: message }) .then(response => { res.status(200).json({ status: true, response: response }); }) .catch(err => { res.status(500).json({ status: false, response: err }); }); }
if (numberDDI === '55' && numberDDD > 30) { const number = "55" + numberDDD + numberUser + "@s.whatsapp.net"; SendMessage(number, { text: message }) .then(response => { res.status(200).json({ status: true, response: response }); }) .catch(err => { res.status(500).json({ status: false, response: err }); }); }
inside the isExists function it already returns the correct jid, so just take the result of it and replace
inside the isExists function it already returns the correct jid, so just take the result of it and replace
I use it just as @lopesclayton reported and it works for me.
No problem at Baileys, I see you have some solutions for your reported issue. I believe you can close the issue @JoaoNetoDev