Aditya Sharad

As a different opt-in mechanism, we could have a command to run rather than a setting. Either would work fine for a user examining their code before submission.

[Go to Type Definition](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specification#textDocument_typeDefinition) sounds like a more appropriate language server command in this case than [Workspace Symbols](https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specification#workspace_symbol) which is referenced in #637.

> I am unsure how to test this without waiting for the next CodeQL release and monitoring our telemetry during the period of time when the older cached version is...

> I am unsure how to test this without waiting for the next CodeQL release and monitoring our telemetry during the period of time when the older cached version is...

> I am unsure how to test this without waiting for the next CodeQL release and monitoring our telemetry during the period of time when the older cached version is...

Thanks! I have addressed all comments (with minor tweaks). This will need a fresh approval, sorry.

Thanks for the feedback: as I understand it, the request is to expose an Actions context value and environment variable that consistently returns the full path to the workflow file...

@michael-hawker Yes, CodeQL automatically injects those flags into specific `dotnet` build commands. Apologies for the trouble: we have recently fixed (for example https://github.com/github/codeql/pull/13794) some issues where we were injecting into...

Hello, and glad to see your interest in using CodeQL! It looks here like `py.exe` (the Windows Python Launcher) is on your `PATH`, but `python.exe` itself may not be on...

> I also tried with Go but I don't have installed it so it throws an error > Does it requires any language binary ? Like installing Python, Go, GCC,...